[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 15827
Date: Tue Mar 7 21:22:01 GMT 2000
Author: Kimes, Dean W.
Subject: RE: [eqbards] (OT) Theft in EQ Redux
On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Kimes, Dean W. wrote:
>
> attorney gaming friend laid it out. Interestingly as such, Verant also
> cannot ban someone for anything they say while online. Despite the fact
> that it is in the TOS that you cannot say certain things without being
> banned, US civil liberties laws specifically prohibit anyone from
> voluntarily abrogating their own constitutional rights except in cases of
> national security.
Well, Verant is also a private company, and thus has the right
to deny access to the game to anyone they want. I don't
recall the Supreme Court decision governing this (way too long
since I took the course), but basically there was a dispute as
to whether a private company could be forced via civil liberty
obligations into a legal contract they didn't want. The
ruling was that it could not, although the government could
penalize it by witholding federal funding for that reason.
--
John H. Kim
kim@...
------------------------------------------------------------------------
MAXIMIZE YOUR CARD, MINIMIZE YOUR RATE!
Get a NextCard Visa, in 30 seconds! Get rates as low as
0.0% Intro or 9.9% Fixed APR and no hidden fees.
Apply NOW!
http://click.egroups.com/1/2122/5/_/451022/_/952464045/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter to lol@...
with the subject submissions.