[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 15829
Date: Tue Mar 7 21:29:35 GMT 2000
Author: jhenders@bogon.com
Subject: Re: [eqbards] (OT) Theft in EQ Redux
On Tue, Mar 07/00, "Kimes, Dean W." <dean_kimes@...> wrote:
> From: "Kimes, Dean W." <dean_kimes@...>
>
> It is property, according to definitions under US Law. One of my gaming
> buddies, who is a lawyer, came up with an even more interesting proposition.
> If my equipment is saleable my me, and therefore my property, if Verant
> decides to deny me access to that equipment without due process, they are
> guilty of denying me my own property without such due process, which is
> under US law a violation of my civil rights. I may have the wording not
> entirely correct on this as it is from memory, but that's about how our
> attorney gaming friend laid it out. Interestingly as such, Verant also
> cannot ban someone for anything they say while online. Despite the fact
> that it is in the TOS that you cannot say certain things without being
> banned, US civil liberties laws specifically prohibit anyone from
> voluntarily abrogating their own constitutional rights except in cases of
> national security.
>
> Makes one think doesn't it.
--
Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity.
GAT d- -p+(--) c++++ l++ u++ t- m--- W--- !v
b+++ e* s-/+ n-(?) h++ f+g+ w+++ y*