[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 1655
Date: Wed Jun 9 12:40:19 BST 1999
Author: J.R. Hyde
Subject: Re: Petition and general opinions
>I gain so little exp in a group it isn't even funny. This is why I don'tThe amount of xp that is possible to earn in a group is greater than as a
>group, because the exp is AWFUL. Anyone else had the same experience? If
>you haven't tried soloing, I suggest you try it. You may never want to go
>back.
>
>>And my final point of the night: (And here's where I expect to work on myHeh, i was gonna chew whoever wrote this ears off untill that last clause.
>>dodge skill:) I think Bards should be denied Plate Mail. Already I can
>>hear the Battle Bards winding up - but hear me out: The Bard was never
>>intended to be a grunt-class. The big burly types should be the ones
>>soaking the damage and such, not us. Of course, before they make any
>>changes like this, they should also fix that tiny little bug that makes us
>>the primary target ALL the time :(
>
>When I do group, I find one of my main selling points is "I can't dish out
>the damage, but I sure can take it". It seems to me that platemail is a
>perfect way to counter-balance the relatively small amount of damage we can
>do. Very few classes do less raw damage, but I can solo because even the
>toughest creatures find it difficult to dent my bronze platemail. And in a
>group, the combination of my platemail and ability to attract the attention
>of the mobs, makes me a great tank, taking the damage whilst the
>spellcasters dish it out. From a roleplay perspective (oddly necessary for
>some of you) . . . don't get an image of the Bard as some sort of
>wandering weakling artist. Our skill may lie in singing, not fighting, but
>we are strong surviving types. We are used to braving the dangers of the
>wild, and can take a beating, as well we should.
>
>-Musil Tearsong