[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 1675
Date: Wed Jun 9 18:20:33 BST 1999
Author: Sean Kennedy
Subject: Re: Petition and general opinions


-----Original Message-----
From: Talies the Wanderer <snicker@...>
To: eqbards@onelist.com <eqbards@onelist.com>
Date: Tuesday, June 08, 1999 7:33 PM
Subject: [eqbards] Petition and general opinions


>From: Talies the Wanderer <snicker@...>
>
>The petition (posted at least twice today) brought to light several *very*
>important Bardic issues (I can only hope that the other classes have as
>much itelligent discussion going on.)


I agreed with all your points, and registered that in the petition.

I think, however, that if we lost plate mail, we would need to
get some better ac or spell shield effect in the buff lines.

I also don't think we should get bind any more than rangers, paladins
or sk's. I actually saw a post stating that monks should have bind
at high levels, some idea that a high level monk was so in touch with
his chi that he could bind it to a spot :)

Bind should stay the purview of the pure casters, as should gate.

Tindayen, Journeyman bard of Povar