[<a href='17463.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='17461.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='17464.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='17457.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 17462 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Fri Apr  7 15:32:50 BST 2000 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> Kenneth E. Bachman <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [eqbards] Instrument vs. melee attacks <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-829036262">I&#39;m curious whether anyone has done the same thing for our travel songs (speed, underwater, levitate,<br/>
invis).  And if anyone has checked whether the RADIUS of the songs increase if instruments are used?<br/>
<br/>
Kenross Cantoforjado, 47 songs, Innoruuk<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
Sylly Songsynger wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> &gt; It might be worth while to analyse AE more closely.  For the past 10+<br/>
&gt; levels, I am concerned with keeping my clerics and casters in AE for mana<br/>
&gt; song and spend time in outside views watching for the sparkles.  It might be<br/>
&gt; worth while to get a friend - ungrouped and test the actual AE radius for<br/>
&gt; your dmg songs.  One might find that you can use them with the dreaded<br/>
&gt; enchanters - as long as you can not wake up the sleeping mobs.  And maybe<br/>
&gt; bards can do this once you understand the AE radius well.  Also, this<br/>
&gt; presumes that we want to do this (ie your songs will do more dmg that your<br/>
&gt; weps.)<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; Sylly </span></blockquote></div>