[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 17612
Date: Wed Apr 12 16:07:19 BST 2000
Author: Bill Costlow
Subject: Re: [eqbards] who are we?


This appears to be rapidly approaching the KABONG
phase so I've answered in personal mail.

--- kim@... wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Bill Costlow wrote:
> >
> > I appologise if you thought I was attacking your
> post.
> > I was simply stating my opinion:
>
> Understood.
>
> > "Any group member should be allowed to participate
> in
> > any lotto the group holds."
> >
> > Somebody smarter than me used Baldur's Gate as an
> > example. Wish I'd have thought of that---made the
> > point much better than I did.
>
> Well, that's the thing. I disagree with the
> comparison to
> Baulder's Gate. Yes you don't directly improve
> yourself by
> passing on items that someone else can use better.
> But in the
> long run, it is better for everyone if people
> cooperate like
> this. I won't get into a full blown discussion
> about the
> reasons why this is, but you can look it up on the
> web pretty
> easily. Just do searchs for "prisoner's dilemma"
> and "tragedy
> of the commons." In a nutshell, both of these
> describe
> situations where the most advantageous decision from
> an
> individual standpoint results in the worst possible
> outcome
> for all parties involved.
>
> --
> John H. Kim
> kim@...
>
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send online invitations with Yahoo! Invites.
http://invites.yahoo.com