[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 1779
Date: Thu Jun 10 19:27:00 BST 1999
Author: Douglas Bierbower
Subject: Re: Digest Number 94


Speaking of flames, this is the first ugly post I have seen on this list.


"Kimes, Dean W." wrote:

> From: "Kimes, Dean W." <Dean_Kimes@...>
>
> Maybe if more people would read the posts instead of just rising to defend
> their character we would get a lot more intelligent conversation instead of
> flames!
>
> As I said before all the flames "Whether or not bards can ultimately wear
> plate or not is moot to me, it doesn't fit my image of a bard so I won't"
> was that too difficult for you to understand???
>
> Not once did I ask that Verant remove this ability, in fact I quite clearly
> stated I don't care if they remove it or not. I choose not to wear plate
> because it doesn't fit my role-playing image of a bard, period. I also
> agree with the previous post where not one person has given a valid
> role-playing reason for wearing plate as a bard, although I think there are
> some, but those are not the kind of posts we are seeing. Instead we see
> more, "Oh yeah but..." type of posts.
>
> Heaven forbid someone should make your character weaker in order to further
> atmosphere or enhance the storyline. In fact if all characters could do
> everything we'd all be perfectly balanced, and perfectly boring. Flame
> away, since apparently it is all some of you are capable of.
>
> Kitasi
> The mournful bard of Faydwer on E'ci
> "and no one shall work for money,
> and no one shall work for fame"
> "but each for the joy of the working,
> and each to his seperate star..."
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Looking to expand your world?
> http://www.onelist.com
> ONElist has over 165,000 e-mail communities from which to choose!