[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 17872
Date: Mon Apr 17 11:17:52 BST 2000
Author: Morten Gottrup
Subject: RE: [eqbards] RE: ugh, shutting bards out of lotto getting more widespread


pls remove me from this list

>From: "Jeff Heskett" <tarkin@...>
>Reply-To: eqbards@egroups.com
>To: <eqbards@egroups.com>
>Subject: RE: [eqbards] RE: ugh, shutting bards out of lotto getting more
>widespread
>Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 04:39:00 -0400
>
>thanks for the support all :)
>
>it's clear to me now (as a few have posted here and elsewhere) that since
>the humblest haste item maxes out our speed, melees who could get the full
>speedup from the uber haste items should have priority. so i'm a firm
>believer now that dragon/god haste items should go those without a haste
>song.
>
>of course, we still need an fbss or swirlspine still. sadly the guild
>still
>thinks since we have a haste song, it's a waste to let the bards wear a
>fbss/ssbelt. (tho this may have changed. there are only a couple bards
>left in the guild at dragon/god level. there used to be enough to put a
>bard in every group.) because of the guild rules this would only happen
>for
>us if we joined pickup groups at frenzied, with no guildmates that could
>*cough* use it.
>
>it's a moot point for me now anyway. i left the guild. i never really
>thought it'd happen. these are my friends, not people to help me gather
>loot. leaving over this issue would've been foolish. but it was pretty
>clear in the discussion that too many in the guild think we should make
>useful chars instead and only dig out the bards at large targets, where
>we're actually useful. and what a god-awful burden it was getting us bards
>up to dragon/god level to begin with, why don't we shut up.
>
>but they're still my friends, so i won't say the guild's name :P
>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com