[<a href='18458.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='18456.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='18486.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='18455.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 18457 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Wed May 10 21:07:06 BST 2000 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> Kimes, Dean W. <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: [eqbards] Mithril vs. Lambent <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-539742931">Lambent Vambraces have no +str.  Mithril are +7.  Only 1 AC less as well,<br/>
probably better as +5 magic is usually better than +2 all.<br/>
<br/>
BP is 3 less AC but definitely has stat bonuses.  +30hp and +15 AGI.<br/>
Probably a push in this area with the +5 STA and +25 HP from Lambent.<br/>
<br/>
Mithril Greaves are also +7STR and +5 MR just like the Vambraces.  They are<br/>
3AC less than Lambent though.<br/>
<br/>
Not sure what other Mithril is out there but I think at least 2 of these are<br/>
pretty close to their Lambent counterparts unless you really need the +1<br/>
CHA.<br/>
<br/>
	Kitasi<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> &gt;I&#39;ve only seen 2 Mithril pieces, but they were both inferior to Lambent.<br/>
&gt;BP had less AC, no stat bonuses and weighed more.<br/>
&gt;Vambraces?  had less AC and less +STR.<br/>
&gt;Bien </span></blockquote></div>