[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 18773
Date: Thu May 18 19:46:45 BST 2000
Author: jhenders@bogon.com
Subject: Re: [eqbards] GZ answers some bard questions
> i agreed with Lyrnia too. the argument is not to have higher hit points,Or how about the Warrior bracer? Shrink, and castable on anyone in your
> damage output, defensive skills. that is what makes a warrior/tank. the
> argument was for AC. and i agreed the singing steel AC was fine, but others
> thought it could be higher. this is a very valid point. the clerics i know
> all have AC a lot higher than me, and that is for a good reason. like
> clerics, we get our asses beat on a lot playing our songs. not as much as
> we used to, and that is another huge point, and also why i think the AC is
> fine on singing steel, i mean it's better than imbrued. they vastly reduced
> the taunt factor of our songs, and thus made the proc on a level 51+ weapon
> and level 53 song much less useful. and neither the symphonic harmony proc
> nor the song of dawn can be reliably tested, so who is to say they work at
> all? also i don't think summon drink and summon drink are useful at levels
> 51+. i didn't get 53 levels to give my group food and water. invisibility
> for a warrior... incredibly useful!
>