[<a href='18803.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='18801.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='18803.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='18800.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 18802 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Thu May 18 23:56:38 BST 2000 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> Andy Simpson <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: [eqbards] GZ answers some bard questions <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1526950921"><blockquote><span title="ireply">&gt; -----Original Message-----<br/>
&gt; From: JasonF [mailto:<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:jasonf@...">jasonf@...</a>]<br/>
<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; Warrior Greaves cast Invisibility.  That&#39;s cool, but we have a<br/>
&gt; song for that<br/>
&gt; guys.  Think about it, we *don&#39;t* have songs that can summon food<br/>
&gt; and drink.<br/>
&gt; I think it&#39;s kinda nifty, but I will admit that I hope the BP casts Gate.<br/>
&gt; :)<br/>
&gt;<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>We do have a *skill* for summoning food and drink however.<br/>
<br/>
Giving us this is like like giving a warrior a piece with Effect: Taunt and<br/>
another with Effect: Bash.  It really doesn&#39;t make much sense.<br/>
<br/>
Also in answer to the whole AC thing.  I&#39;m not so concerned about our AC<br/>
compared to other things we can wear.  I&#39;m concerned about our AC compared<br/>
to classes that are restricted from wearing plate.  There is no way under<br/>
that model that Rogue and Ranger armor should have the same AC as Bard<br/>
armor.  I agree it doesn&#39;t have to be as high as Warriors, but it should be<br/>
higher than chain.  I suspect that the Clerics are in the same boat here<br/>
though I haven&#39;t paid any attention to their armor stats...<br/>
<br/>
Anthem Dirgemaker<br/>
Level 52 Minstrel of Qeynos<br/>
Solusek Ro</div>