[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 19031
Date: Sat May 27 03:15:10 BST 2000
Author: jay schultze
Subject: RE: [eqbards] New patch message
>From: Adam Wasserman <wassermana@...>Look up netiquette in regards to mailing lists, please. The point isn't that
>Reply-To: eqbards@egroups.com
>To: "'eqbards@egroups.com'" <eqbards@egroups.com>
>Subject: RE: [eqbards] New patch message
>Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 11:48:28 -0400
>
>a) I just hit reply from time to time without snipping the content of the
>previous message. Sorry. It happens. I always post at the top of the
>message
>so there's no need to read the entire thing. What I don't get is why would
>you care? The message is less than 5 kb. I hope to god you're not stuck on
>a
>2400 baud modem. If you have a halfway decent connection (33.6 or higher)
>then you will notice ZERO difference in the time it takes you to download
>the message. I hardly see the worth in bitching about it.