[<a href='19525.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='19523.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='19525.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='19522.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 19524 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Thu Jun  8 16:14:50 BST 2000 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> Greg Gillan <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: [eqbards] Verant priorities again <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-2119959256">I don&#39;t think 51 was really that bad.  It probably just seemed worse because<br/>
we&#39;d never experienced such hellish levels before.  54 is definately brutal<br/>
though.  I think I&#39;m going on 3 weeks at 54 now :)<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
Elwyn &lt;Da`Kor&gt;<br/>
54 Minstrel of Erollisi Marr <br/>
<br/>
-----Original Message-----<br/>
From: Garramone, Michael (CCI-Las Vegas)<br/>
[mailto:<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:garramone@...">garramone@...</a>]<br/>
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2000 10:51 AM<br/>
To: &#39;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:eqbards@egroups.com">eqbards@egroups.com</a>&#39;<br/>
Subject: RE: [eqbards] Verant priorities again<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
grats on 52!  yes, 52 and 53 are better than 51.  but 54 is worse than 51.<br/>
i heard 51, 54, and 59 are the really bad ones, worse than the normal bad<br/>
ones =/<br/>
<br/>
Shada, 54.4</div>