[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 19541
Date: Fri Jun 9 13:15:41 BST 2000
Author: jay schultze
Subject: RE: [eqbards] Verant priorities again
>From: "Garramone, Michael (CCI-Las Vegas)" <garramone@...>________________________________________________________________________
>Reply-To: eqbards@egroups.com
>To: "'eqbards@egroups.com'" <eqbards@egroups.com>
>Subject: RE: [eqbards] Verant priorities again
>Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 10:51:14 -0400
>
>grats on 52! yes, 52 and 53 are better than 51. but 54 is worse than 51.
>i heard 51, 54, and 59 are the really bad ones, worse than the normal bad
>ones =/
>
>Shada, 54.4