[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 19904
Date: Tue Jun 20 22:39:33 BST 2000
Author: Perhaps a Princess...
Subject: RE: [eqbards] Bard Training in Kunark


Gordon's answer is based on "We never meant this to be a one-stop shopping"
IMHO, people scream enough, they are more likely to remove ALL the trainers
and bankers than to put in a few.

OTOH, if they do that, I think they also will find the population in
Kunark leave. Its not fun to do that boat ride all the time. I have
basically
moved to Kunark, going back to the mainland only to buy spells.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Gordon Hughes [mailto:ghughes@...]
>Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2000 11:18 AM
>To: eqbards@egroups.com
>Subject: RE: [eqbards] Bard Training in Kunark
>
>
>>
>There aren't any trainers because we didn't get any skills after 50 (till
>53).
>>
>
>Even so, now that Kunark is live, other classes have training facilities on
>the new continent. So maybe RoK Beta was tested by higher level PCs who
>didn't need training, but it doesn't change the fact that players are now
>flocking there from all level ranges, and as such, want to visit a trainer
>when they level.
>
>What about those Bards that have saved up practice points and just want to
>increase a skill or learn the basics of a new language? Unlike
>the majority
>of other classes (I think there's one other class that doesn't have a
>trainer, correct me if I'm wrong), we have to travel to Kelethin
>or Freeport
>for the privilege.
>
>Gordon's answer of (paraphrased) "We don't want people to become totally
>self-sufficient on the new continent" screams of being a cop-out. Other
>classes are, why can't we?
>
>-KS
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Find long lost high school friends:
>http://click.egroups.com/1/5544/10/_/451022/_/961536583/
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter to
>lol@... with the subject submissions.
>
>