[<a href='19924.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='19922.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='19924.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='19921.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 19923 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Wed Jun 21 14:56:17 BST 2000 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> Gary Johnston <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: [eqbards] Player wipe on Test <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-155281308">how good are verant if they don&#39;t have a working backup beforehand :P<br/>
<br/>
I lost a couple of chars on test but it wasn&#39;t my main server but I still<br/>
think its a lame excuse, I mean are verant really gonna test out all the<br/>
uber items that aren&#39;t commonly available anymore? pigs will evolve and fly<br/>
sooner I think :)<br/>
<br/>
-----Original Message-----<br/>
From: Jamie Bedford [mailto:<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:bbedford@...">bbedford@...</a>]<br/>
Sent: 21 June 2000 14:52<br/>
To: <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:eqbards@egroups.com">eqbards@egroups.com</a><br/>
Subject: Re: [eqbards] Player wipe on Test<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
Hate to play the devils advocate here, but maybe verant planned that solB<br/>
stuff just to see how greedy everyone who was supposed to be *testing* the<br/>
game actually was?  I mean, how good of a tester are you if you&#39;re<br/>
exploiting a bug for 10 hours?</div>