[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 20050
Date: Tue Jun 27 21:03:33 BST 2000
Author: jhenders@bogon.com
Subject: Re: [eqbards] Another Lullaby question
On Tue, Jun 27/00, Mike Merck <mmerck@...> wrote:
> I think the reason lullaby will never work to the degree we all want it too
> is simple - it would devalue the enchanter class to such a huge degree there
> would hardly be a need for them. It would be so hugely unbalancing that VI
> will never make it work the way it seems it should.
>
> An AoE mez that doesn't require mana, doesn't require targeting, allows you
> to melee as well and crowd control with no effort, risk or thought other
> than hitting a single hotkey is just too powerful.
>
> It's the same reason they nerfed 54 chains.
>
> Maybe what people should do is offer suggestions about how to balance the
> song in a different way other than having it not work 90% of the time. Like,
> make it cost mana for each pulse or make it effect the bard as well as the
> mobs, or make it a single pulse song instead of a constant one.
>
> > After looking over the Lullaby data again while posting a huge sledgehammer
> > of a question hit me over the head.
> >
> > Why does Lullaby have a secondary resist???
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Shop online together. Plan vacations. Visit your favorite sites.
> With iKena you and your friends can see the Web together.
> iKena software is quick to download, simple to install, easy to use.
> http://click.egroups.com/1/5257/13/_/451022/_/962133206/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter to lol@... with the subject submissions.
>
>
--
Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity.
GAT d- -p+(--) c++++ l++ u++ t- m--- W--- !v
b+++ e* s-/+ n-(?) h++ f+g+ w+++ y*