[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 20190
Date: Fri Jun 30 01:21:39 BST 2000
Author: Reece, Tom CPT- 25IDL G4
Subject: Official Players Council (OT)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Reece, Tom CPT- 25IDL G4
> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 5:11 PM
> To: 'gwrinn@...'
> Subject: Official Players Council
>
> Gordon,
>
> First off, thanks for taking the time to read this email. I realize you
> get a lot of emails everyday and don't have the time to respond to all of
> them. I'm hoping you can make an exception for this one.
>
> I have an idea I would like to propose to Verant. Someone may have
> suggested this idea in the past but if so I'm not aware if Verant has
> stated an official position on it. What I propose is that Verant set up
> some type of official player's council. This council could perform
> several functions. First, it could function as a focus group for game
> related issues. Verant could use these players as a sounding board for
> potential changes to the game. The council could also serve as a voice
> for class concerns. I'll use bards as an example. For months bards have
> been claiming that the Lullaby song is broken. There have been numerous
> posts and bumps on the Gameplay forum asking Verant to acknowledge the
> song is broken and fix it. Many bards are frustrated due to the perceived
> lack of action on Verant's part. However, if Verant informed the player's
> council on the status of the fix (if there is one), then the bard
> representatives can inform the bard community that Verant IS working on
> the song and for them to remain patient. This would go a long way in
> reducing player dissatisfaction with certain aspects of the game.
>
> Here is an example of how the council can be set up:
>
> 1) The players get to choose who will represent them. Each class gets
> ten representatives. The class fansite web boards will be used to vote on
> the representatives. For example, bards have The Concert Hall, rogues
> have The Safehouse, etc. The administrators for those sites would be
> responsible for setting up a poll for each class to determine who they
> want to represent them. I think that it would be fairly easy for the
> community of each class to come to a consensus on who they want. My
> primary character is a bard so I'm most familiar with that community.
> There are several well known bards who post on the Concert Hall board and
> the eqbards mailing list. These bards would be prime candidates as
> official representatives for the class. I think it is also safe to assume
> that other classes have equivalent players.
>
> 2) Type of forum. This could be set up as a moderated mailing list or a
> secure message board on the Everquest website. Either way, the only
> people with access to the site are the player representatives and Verant
> employees. There would have to be a rule established that all discussion
> between Verant and the representatives is considered confidential and not
> for public release unless Verant grants permission. Any player who
> violates this rule is removed from the council and a replacement selected.
>
> This just covers the basic framework. The details can get fleshed out
> later if Verant thinks its a good idea.
>
> As you are well aware of, a lot of players are frustrated with Verant for
> a perceived lack of customer service. In my opinion, Verant can improve
> their relationship with their player base by instituting an official
> player's council. This would go a long way in helping to prove that
> Verant cares for the players. Its a win-win situation for both sides that
> can be easily implemented.
>
> Thanks for taking the time to consider this proposal.
>
> Tom Reece
> aka Galtin Randayn
> 39 bard
> E'ci server
>