[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 20441
Date: Wed Jul 12 15:53:33 BST 2000
Author: Garramone, Michael (CCI-Las Vegas)
Subject: RE: [eqbards] Bards forgotten again.... [Long]


sigh, yes i agree as well. you don't think i know all this? i knew i would
get completely misunderstood. my simple point was that we are more
effective by singing songs that increase the effectiveness of the group
while killing high level mobs, rather than singing damage songs. but IF you
feel the need to do damage you should probably use weapons instead of songs.
if you are singing damage songs, you are not singing buffs. i did say this
many times, and thanks Lyrnia for taking it as an argument instead of an
intelligent discussion.

Shada Powa, L56 Wood Elf Troubador
<Afterlife> Mithaniel Marr

> Agreed Sylly, which is exactly what most of us have been
> saying. The "most
> effective" bard isn't one that locks themselves into one
> pattern of play.
> The "Most effective" bard is the bard that knows when to put
> the weapons
> away and use a different tactic. Sometimes you just dont
> WANT to be up
> there swinging away. It all depends on your situation, group
> makeup, mob
> makeup, level, etc. A truely effective bard understands that
> there is never
> any one way to handle a situation and an extremely effective
> bard knows
> which methods to use for each situation that comes up.
>
> Done arguing this thread myself ;) It's turning into a
> 'tastes great',
> 'less filling' thread.
>
> Lyrnia Jongleur
> Singing since Beta 2