[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 20483
Date: Thu Jul 13 11:13:30 BST 2000
Author: Bill Costlow
Subject: RE: [eqbards] Re: Chants vs. Melee (was Bards forgotten again.... )
> you're right, if there is an enchanter or shaman or__________________________________________________
> both in the group then
> there is very little for a bard to do to buff the
> group, if anything but
> mana. that's a situation where you can do some song
> damage (or take a
> breather if an easy camp and just relax, 56 levels
> of twisting songs is
> killing my fingers), and i said many times that our
> songs do a lot more
> damage than our weapons. but if a bard is there to
> do the group buffing,
> you are not going to be using songs to do damage.
> that was my only point,
> which i regret even trying to make since it did not
> come across correctly,
> and now i am the stupid bard who doesn't know how to
> play.
>
> Shada
>
> > I'm gonna have to agree to disagree on Sylly's
> side. :)
> >
> > Last night in Sebilis we had 2 groups.. including
> a Shaman and
> > Enchanter (2 at one point). I didn't need to
> Haste, Slow, Snare (2
> > druids), Heal (2 clerics, 2 druids, 1 shaman)... I
> could have sang
> > battle buffs to buff some str and dex and such,
> but there was only 1
> > tank (Warrior) in my party... not a whole lot of
> mileage gained. So,
> > I chanted (with selo's drum) and I charmed (a
> little) and I played
> > mana song and bind sight to help scout in the
> downtime.
> >
> > Was I being the most effective Bard I could be...
> imho, Yes. And was
> > that helpful to the group? Hell, yes. Don't
> forget the magic, fire,
> > and cold resistances you're also lowering on top
> of the damage you're
> > doing. That's helping every one of your nukers,
> procing weapons,
> > overzealous druids with their newfound starburst,
> etc.
>