[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 20633
Date: Mon Jul 24 16:06:52 BST 2000
Author: Kevin L. Crawford
Subject: Re: [eqbards] Re: reality check
----- Original Message -----
From: "Elijah Meeker" <emeeker@...>
To: <eqbards@egroups.com>
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 10:26 AM
Subject: RE: [eqbards] Re: reality check
>
> > No, Just like any other spell/song you cannot place two
> > instances of the
> > same song on a creature. Same as for healing you cannot
> > 'stack' healing
> > with itself.
> >
> > Basically any song/affect with a "duration" cannot be stacked.
>
> This makes sense of course, but I am still left explaining what appened in
a
> 2 bard 1 cleric group (all 34) at the giant fort in the Frontier
mountains.
> With only 3 it very much seemed like you could easily see the effect of
> different strategies when fighting tumps.The cleric was only healing, the
> other bard was a fellow I know and who said the effects didn't stack, I
said
> I thought they did, so as an experiment he switched from Melee to all
> instrument.
> We were taking about the same damage and the cleric was finishing with the
> same mana. The cleric reported that the health was indeed dropping faster
on
> the tump, both us bards being a little too busy to really judge. We
fought
> for about an hour this way, and if one of us was doing no more than
punching
> damage (and allowing fewer knocks out of songs) that means that one of us
> was superfluous, but I am certain a group of one bard and a cleric would
not
> do nearly as well.
> I understand this is not a very scientific study, at all, but it seemed
> pretty convincing at the time. Has anyone actually methodically checked
it?
> I am happy to be wrong, but I would be happier being wrong with a good
> explanation for what happened :o)
>
> Tsengu/Tszaaz
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> BTW: Did you buy that new car yet?
> If not, check this site out.
> They're called CarsDirect.com and it's a pretty sweet way to buy a car.
> http://click.egroups.com/1/6847/13/_/451022/_/964448864/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter to lol@...
with the subject submissions.
>