[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 20935
Date: Thu Aug 10 19:04:07 BST 2000
Author: Bill Costlow
Subject: RE: [eqbards] Oh this can't be good....


10,000 bards are screaming that lullaby is broken, one
says "I don't think it's so bad" and he uses that as
an arguement?

If somebody told this guy the sky was purple and it
suited his purpose, he'd believe it.

--- Adam Wasserman <wassermana@...> wrote:

> Now that I think of it, I think I may
> remember someone
> stating that lullaby's current functionality is
> intended, as it's the only
> thing to keep them from trivializing encounters.
> I'll have to check with
> Ester when she gets back to be sure."
>
> Like you, I refuse to believe they are outright
> lying, so I come to the
> conclusion that he has no clue. He remembers the
> patch that nerfed chains,
> but he doesn't know how it affected the lower level
> song. Again with
> lullaby, he remembers the last time it was looked
> at, but doesn't know that
> we still see a HUGE problem.
>
> Maybe I'm hopelessly optimistic and refuse to see
> the truth that is evident,
> but I just can't imagine that he knows and is
> covering it up. Instead I
> think that he is hopelessly swamped by email,
> message board postings and
> whatever other work he may have and in that mountain
> of information, ours
> got pushed to the bottom and never seen.
>
> Draelon Stormsong
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kimes, Dean W.
> [mailto:dean_kimes@...]
> Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 11:37 AM
> To: 'eqbards@egroups.com'
> Subject: RE: [eqbards] Oh this can't be good....
>
>
> I generally try to be open-minded, but...
> I agree with you on the experience parts of your
> post, not a big deal, and
> its not going to change.
>
> On the song related parts of your post though, have
> you been living under a
> rock for the last 6 months?
>
> There have been numerous postings to the EQ boards,
> emails directly to GZ
> and Abashi, posts on the EQ_Caster's Board (which
> they do read), as well as
> messages sent thru Baelish (runs EQ_Casters, talks
> to GZ nearly daily).
>
> Many of these posts have contained ridiculously
> detailed information on the
> problems with the broken songs. John Kim and myself
> have broken the things
> down statistically to the point where it was readily
> apparent that the
> resist rates were down to tenths of a percent with
> variances of +/- 2 tenths
> of a percent.
>
> There is ABSOLUTELY no way they can claim they don't
> know what we think is
> wrong with these songs and still be truthful. They
> ARE ignoring us.
> (Harmonic is gone right? If not, my apologies Harm)
> Well maybe they aren't ignoring us, but in that case
> they are purposely
> lying to us instead. I prefer to assume the former.
>
> Kitasi Faegehearper
>
> 1) They aren't ignoring us. Instead they just have
> no idea that we think
> there is a problem that needs to be looked at.
> Abashi is a busy man, I'm
> willing to give him the benefit of the doubt and
> hope that he missed our
> posts or forgot them.
>
> 2) If we can make them aware of what we think is
> wrong, then we can get them
> to look at it and there is a possibility that we can
> get it fixed. This to
> me is good news. The only problem is how to get our
> thoughts looked at. I
> suggest we write up a concise description of the
> problems. (insane resist
> rates on pixie strike and lullaby and
> ineffectiveness of snare since the
> patch) then we post it to the bug board and the
> gameplay board, as well as
> emailing it to abashi.
>
> Draelon Stormsong
>
>
>
> Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter
> to lol@...
> with the subject submissions.
>
>

>
> Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter
> to lol@... with the subject submissions.
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites.
http://invites.yahoo.com/