[<a href='21001.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='20999.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='0.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='20999.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 21000 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Wed Aug 16 03:37:55 BST 2000 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> Ken Bachman <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [eqbards] Oh this can&#39;t be good.... (my last post on the topi c) <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-870691556">Adam Wasserman wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; <br/>
&gt; I am merely writing to explain my words, not to spark a debate.<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; I am not making a judgement on Abashi. I&#39;m not saying what is or what isn&#39;t<br/>
&gt; his job to know. All I was saying was that based on what he wrote in his<br/>
&gt; post, I don&#39;t think he was aware of what we were talking about.<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; Whether he should have known or could have known or used to know has nothing<br/>
&gt; to do with what I said.<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; Drae<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>I wasn&#39;t disagreeing with you, I was using your post as a launching board to vent. <br/>
 In fact, I DO agree with you, that&#39;s what troubles me.  If he doesn&#39;t know by now <br/>
what we&#39;re talking about, how the heck are we supposed to get him to notice?  I <br/>
honestly think that, when we talk about Chains, he thinks we&#39;re talking about the <br/>
early-break modification they made, and when we&#39;re talking about Lullaby, we&#39;re <br/>
complaining about there being a secondary resist, period, or perhaps that we&#39;re <br/>
still complaining about the lack of a secondary resist message.  If he <br/>
off-handedly assumes that this is the case each time he sees a new thread, and <br/>
doesn&#39;t bother to read the thread, then we&#39;ll NEVER get him to get a clue.  If he <br/>
actually READs these threads, and STILL doesn&#39;t get it, it&#39;s even more hopeless.<br/>
<br/>
Kenross Cantoforjado, 52 songs, Innoruuk</div>