could it be that they are understaffed like hundreds of other tech companies in california?
guess what, it's easy to say we need 10 testers, it's another thing entirely to hire 10
qualified people to be testers.
At 07:10 PM 8/23/00 -0500, you wrote:
>If the higher priority items were truly along those lines - I'd strongly
>agree with you. But do you truly believe that for the past, lets say three
>or four months (by which time this bug has "aged" long enough for my comment
>to be valid) - every item addressed by the testing department has been those
>type of serious problems?
>
>Secondly - it seems that there are only one or two testers for the Live
>team. IMHO this is woefully inadequate. Doesn't Verant say they have
>approx 300,000 subscribers? Three million dollars a month revenue only buys
>us two testers? I hope there are more testers quietly working away out of
>the spotlight...
>
>Anyway - I do believe that we need to have a certain amount of "Squeaky
>Wheel" mentality. Albeit politely, and no flames. I do believe I worded my
>comments in a "non-whining" manner. We've been quietly, patiently waiting
>for this issue to be addressed - I don't want to see it pushed to the
>backburner.