[<a href='21305.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='21303.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='21306.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='21301.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 21304 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Fri Sep  8 21:28:33 BST 2000 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> Reece Tom R CPT 25 ID L G4(n) <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: [eqbards] Horizons (was Official confirmation from Ester) <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-294342905">UWOO and Anarchy Online are in the same category.  The developers from both<br/>
of those games have promised a new PvP system which will largely eliminate<br/>
grief PKers but still promote PvP (i.e. guildwars).  UWOO has guaranteed<br/>
their new system will work.  Remains to be seen though.  Also, I&#39;ve never<br/>
played UO, but from what I&#39;ve read on the UWOO mailing list, grief PKing in<br/>
UO now has been largely solved.  No idea how it was solved though.  <br/>
<br/>
Galtin of E&#39;ci<br/>
<br/>
-----Original Message-----<br/>
From: <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:jhenders@...">jhenders@...</a> [mailto:<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:jhenders@...">jhenders@...</a>]<br/>
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 10:21 AM<br/>
To: <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:eqbards@egroups.com">eqbards@egroups.com</a><br/>
Subject: Re: [eqbards] Horizons (was Official confirmation from Ester)<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
Isn&#39;t Horizons another one of those games where the developers think<br/>
that in spite of UO having nothing but problems with PKs and grief<br/>
players, and EQ showing the overwhelming majority prefer a PvP<br/>
switch, that they can come up with the perfect, abuse free forced PvP<br/>
environment?<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]</div>