[<a href='21352.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='21350.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='0.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='0.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 21351 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Mon Sep 11 21:40:46 BST 2000 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> Kimes, Dean W. <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: [eqbards] New Bard thread on our songs <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-196416879">An excellent discussion to be sure.  Unfortunately acknowledging this would<br/>
put Verant in the position of admitting they are wrong and just don&#39;t care.<br/>
Good to see exact numbers from an enchanter on how many mobs he can keep<br/>
mez&#39;d forever with both Clarity and Clarity II.  Seeing they could control<br/>
15 even cons long enough for an evac was an eye opener even for me.  Even<br/>
before Lullaby was &#39;fixed&#39; a bard would not have been able to do that.  The<br/>
first one to break would likely bash him and end the song routine.<br/>
<br/>
	Kitasi<br/>
<br/>
-----------------------------------------------------------_-&gt;<br/>
<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://boards.station.sony.com/everquest/Forum2/HTML/009372.html">http://boards.station.sony.com/everquest/Forum2/HTML/009372.html</a><br/>
<br/>
this is a very well written thread discussing the effects of constant<br/>
refreshes on our resist rates.<br/>
<br/>
Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter to <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:lol@...">lol@...</a><br/>
with the subject submissions.</div>