[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 21479
Date: Tue Sep 19 20:21:24 BST 2000
Author: jhenders@bogon.com
Subject: Re: [eqbards] Today's patch message.


On Tue, Sep 19/00, John Tatsukawa <john@...> wrote:
>
> Well since we are the Jack of All Trades (Master of None) I just take it in
> stride. Besides, there aren't all that many enchanters around, and when
> there are, the enchanters are always happy to have me in the group with them.
>
> As always, it depends on the situation. Sometimes a bard might be better,
> sometimes a specific class would be better. Besides, if you're grouped with
> a bunch of jerks who boot you from a group, simply because they want one
> class over another, I'd be only too happy not to be with a them.

I think you are misreading what he said and allowing your emotional
attachment to your character cloud your vision of the bard's
effectiveness. He didn't mean a bard would be kicked from a group to
make room for an enchanter. In the high level game that doesn't happen
because groups don't form unless they have an enchanter anyway.

As to enchanters being happy to have you in the group, every caster
loves the mana song just like every caster loves clarity. Some of us
aspired to being a little more than a mana pump when we reached the
pinnacle of our class at higher levels. With the latest patch you can
now add ineffective haste to our ineffective crowd control in our list
of defining abilities.


--
Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity.
GAT d- -p+(--) c++++ l++ u++ t- m--- W--- !v
b+++ e* s-/+ n-(?) h++ f+g+ w+++ y*