[<a href='21602.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='21600.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='21602.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='21600.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 21601 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Mon Oct  2 19:40:09 BST 2000 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> Gordon Hughes <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: [eqbards] new topic ;) <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-2121350843"><blockquote><span title="ireply">&gt;<br/>
 </span></blockquote>In other news, who sees their server not bothering to get Bardic Epic<br/>
weapons, because of the warrior-conflicts?<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt;<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>/em raises hand<br/>
<br/>
Lots and lots of Warriors on Bertox but very few Bards.  I think I&#39;ve seen<br/>
about a ten or so post-50.<br/>
<br/>
I could see Prophecy doing it *easily*, but if they&#39;re smart, they&#39;ll outfit<br/>
their warriors first.  And before I&#39;m flamed for not supporting my fellow<br/>
Bards... in a group/raid situation, the Warrior quest weapon is going to be<br/>
far more useful than the Singing Short Sword.  Our primary function at those<br/>
events is resists/mana/regen.  When was the last time you saw a Bard wading<br/>
in and delivering the killing blow to Trak? ;)<br/>
<br/>
As weapons go, it&#39;s very nice, but it looks more like a &#39;status symbol&#39; for<br/>
us rather than anything overly useful.</div>