[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 21813
Date: Wed Oct 11 21:50:59 BST 2000
Author: Kimes, Dean W.
Subject: Curious


That's odd, the thread I posted to the Everquest Boards appears to be gone
after only a few minutes. Can anyone else see it? I know I checked to make
sure it went thru after I posted it.

Kit

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey Sue [mailto:jsue@...]
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 2:08 PM
To: eqbards@egroups.com
Subject: RE: [eqbards] Abashi finally responds... sort of


At 09:00 AM 10/11/00 -1000, you wrote:
>Hmm. I wonder if Jeffrey Sue is the same person as Algara Offkey on the
>Whineplay forums? In case you don't know who Algara is, she is a bard who
>for some reason or another attempts to shoot down many of the issues
>Kaearia, Rokenn and other well known bards have been fighting for. She
>apparently has no problems with how Verant is handling the many issues
>facing bards.

no, that's not me. of course kaearia posted on the concert hall that he
doesn't
have a lot of problems with the way verant is handling the issues either, at
least
with regard to gordon's monster post.

>One other point to make. Just because Kitasi (31st level) and I (39th
>level) are not high level bards doesn't mean we are not aware of all the
>problems higher level bards have to put up with. Both Kitasi and I have
>been members of this mailing list since it was created. Because I read
this
>list as well as the Concert Hall board, I probably know more about the 50+
>bard songs than some of the 50+ bards on my server. If you are content
with
>primarily functioning as a mana battery, then you don't have anything to

say what? where have i ever said EVER that i am functioning as a mana
battery???
everyone else is saying that this is all bards are good for. i have
CONSTANTLY
been saying that i do NOT see this with my bard and that i have just as many
options in playing my bard as i had before. I notice that you two never
address
the logical points in my post re: options available to bards at any level.
you simply
continue the same old line of lullaby is broken, mez is broken, snare is
broken
oh 90% of my options are gone. i say that if that kills 90% of your options
then you aren't playing your bard to the fullest capabilities.

>worry about. No need for you to get involved with any of the discussions
on
>these issues. For the other 99% of the bards out there who want full,
>working functionality out of the class, then there are still issues to
>discuss.

your definition of full working functionality seems to differ with the game
creator's
definition of full working functionality.


>Galtin of E'ci



Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter to lol@...
with the subject submissions.