[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 21843
Date: Wed Oct 11 23:34:56 BST 2000
Author: John Tatsukawa
Subject: Re: [eqbards] Abashi finally responds... sort of
>On Wed, Oct 11/00, "Kimes, Dean W." <dean_kimes@...> wrote:Hey, someone who is using Mutt gets a bonus star in my book already. :-)
> > Working as Intended is a valid response. My problem is that with Verant it
> > has been the only response for bards. (Ok a generalization, but still true
> > on all important issues)
>
>Working as Intended would be a valid responce if some explanation was
>given that showed some actual thought had been put into that intent.
>When used by Abashi, who's only responce to bards requests for
>definitions of how the bard fit's into EQ is to say "I think they are
>just fine" is insulting. His thinking that is merely an opinion, and
>previously, he's admitted he just doesn't "get" bards, so it's an
>admittedly uninformed opinion at best. Of the 5 or 6 L50+ bards that
>were in our guild(s) (we have an alliance with another guild for doing
>high level raids like (formerly planes and dragons) Trakanon, and
>Veeshan's Peak), 3 are now playing other classes and one other has quit
>the game. The fact that the concerns of the least played class in the
>game at high levels are brushed off with this explanation is pretty sad.
>X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88