[<a href='21849.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='21847.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='21850.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='21847.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 21848 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Wed Oct 11 23:49:20 BST 2000 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> jhenders@bogon.com <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [eqbards] I posted this to the Everwhatever boards and to the Concert Hall <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-505440670">On Wed, Oct 11/00, Jeffrey Sue &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:jsue@...">jsue@...</a>&gt; wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; At 03:33 PM 10/11/00 -0700, you wrote:<br/>
&gt; &gt;Yes it can be done. Is the group as effective without an enchanter? Not<br/>
&gt; &gt;by a long shot. Why should one class have the monopoly on bringing that<br/>
&gt; &gt;kind of effectiveness to the group?<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; is a group with a druid or shaman as healer as effective as one without a cleric?<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>Actually, with an enchanter, yes it is. I went all the way to L50 with a<br/>
group that never had a cleric in it but did have an enchanter and it<br/>
rocked. When you only have to deal with one mob in a fight, ever, a<br/>
cleric is actually a waste of a spot pre 50.<br/>
<br/>
Crowd control is the most powerful skill in the game and it&#39;s the<br/>
exclusive domain of the enchanter.<br/>
<br/>
-- <br/>
  Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity.<br/>
            GAT d- -p+(--) c++++ l++ u++ t- m--- W--- !v<br/>
                 b+++ e* s-/+ n-(?) h++ f+g+ w+++ y*</div>