[<a href='21952.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='21950.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='21952.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='21950.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 21951 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Thu Oct 12 22:51:01 BST 2000 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> jhenders@bogon.com <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [eqbards] Abashi finally responds... sort of <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1146465088">On Thu, Oct 12/00, Melaniel &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:online.games@...">online.games@...</a>&gt; wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; <br/>
&gt; I actually found this to be very obvious and I&#39;m surprised more people<br/>
&gt; don&#39;t use it when I watch them.  A lot of enchanters I&#39;ve seen rely on<br/>
&gt; getting only the longer stun off, but I&#39;ve found it easier to do the<br/>
&gt; short one first, then the longer one, then mez.  The mana cost is just<br/>
&gt; insignificant.<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>Also, double stunning helps if some resist the first stun.<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; <br/>
&gt; Anyway, enough said ... this isn&#39;t an enchanter list after all =)<br/>
&gt; <br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>But it&#39;s good to know what other classes are capable of, though it can<br/>
make you even more annoyed at being told you are fine the way you are.<br/>
<br/>
-- <br/>
  Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity.<br/>
            GAT d- -p+(--) c++++ l++ u++ t- m--- W--- !v<br/>
                 b+++ e* s-/+ n-(?) h++ f+g+ w+++ y*</div>