[<a href='23030.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='23028.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='23033.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='23023.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 23029 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Fri Jan 12 00:05:37 GMT 2001 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> jhenders@bogon.com <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [eqbards] Proposal to change how bard haste songs stack with  enchanter/sham an haste spells <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-286932726">On Thu, Jan 11/01, &quot;Kimes, Dean W.&quot; &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:dean_kimes@...">dean_kimes@...</a>&gt; wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; that&#39;s what I thought.  The problem I encountered with mine was that one lag<br/>
&gt; spike or disappearing mob and you died, period.  They just don&#39;t have the<br/>
&gt; hp&#39;s to survive getting caught by one of the charmee&#39;s I found.  Our regular<br/>
&gt; enchanter in the Armigers had even less luck charming than I did, probably<br/>
&gt; due to not having to deal with it on a 12 second basis before ;-)<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>Hmm. Maybe if you have a particularly bad connection. Otherwise, with<br/>
the color line of stuns and mez an enchenter shouldn&#39;t have too much<br/>
trouble re-charming.<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
-- <br/>
  Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity.<br/>
            GAT d- -p+(--) c++++ l++ u++ t- m--- W--- !v<br/>
                 b+++ e* s-/+ n-(?) h++ f+g+ w+++ y*</div>