[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 23123
Date: Mon Jan 15 14:23:53 GMT 2001
Author: s.mccloskey@intest.com
Subject: Re: [eqbards] Rejoice all ye Hybrids


I think he is refering to warriors and rogues.

Gordon:
5. Class-based experience bonuses (which warriors and rogues get) are also
not appropriate, as they cannot be so if penalties are not. However, we've
decided to leave this as-is, since the bonus is not so severe as to be
unbalancing. Bottom line: we don't feel the bonus is enough to warrant a fix
that could be interpreted as a 'nerf'.

-Steve

At 09:56 PM 1/14/01 -0800, you wrote:
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Sean Kennedy" <ksean2@...>
>To: <eqbards@egroups.com>
>Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2001 7:51 PM
>Subject: [eqbards] Rejoice all ye Hybrids
>
>
>> For details on the removal of the hybrid exp penalty
>> (sort of) look at http://eq.castersrealm.com
>>
>
> Lest we forget that verant has stated bards are not hybrids.....
>also look at this I clipped from the post
>
>This is a balance issue we decided was also necessary to address. If we are
>going to make the statement that class experience penalties should not
>exist, we then have to do it on both ends (with exception to the two classes
>that we've decided to leave as-is).
>
>How much you wanna bet that bards will be one of the "as-is" classes.