[<a href='23471.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='23469.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='23471.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='23469.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 23470 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Wed Jan 24 19:15:00 GMT 2001 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> Garramone, Michael (CCI-Las Vegas) <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: [eqbards] (OT) Tech problem, any suggestions? <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-2025003229">the benchmarks i have seen have all shown Win2K much lower than WinME or<br/>
Win98SE for 3D performance.  the via chipsets are pretty good in both,<br/>
sometimes WinME being slightly better.  this is from 3DMark2000 benchmarks.<br/>
<br/>
Shada<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> &gt; As long as we&#39;re off-topic, though, anyone out there gaming <br/>
&gt; on Win2k, and <br/>
&gt; which do you feel is better (for gaming): Win2k, WinME, or Win98? </span></blockquote></div>