the point was not that you would be feared or ae damaged or whatever. the point
was that you would get the same effectivity at about 175 as at about 245.
the way to test this is to have someone get to about 176 in resists and compare
effectivity with someone at 245 in resists.
At 06:50 PM 2/22/01 +0000, you wrote:
>Sorry Sylly, my question was mainly for the group. I was agreeing
>with you. Every dragon/resist necessary encounter that I've been to,
>I have never been feared, resist gravity fluxed, taken minimal
>damage, etc. I was just wondering why people are talking about this
>soft resist cap. This is the first place that I've heard of it. And
>I was joking about the bard conspiracy.
>
>~Beatdrop Battledrum
>
>
>--- In eqbards@y..., James Schuldes <jgs@s...> wrote:
> > I don't understand your question (soft cap? uber-guild conspiracy?)
>but I
> > have been on raids, very recently, and have seen first hand where
>the bard
> > resist songs makes a significant difference. And this is not a one
>time
> > observation.
> >
> > Sylly
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: beatdropbattledrum@h...
> > [mailto:beatdropbattledrum@h...]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 5:33 PM
> > To: eqbards@y...
> > Subject: [eqbards] Re: Patch Message
> >
> >
> > Has this soft cap on resists been confirmed? Or are we just
>relying
> > on this uberguild leader that may have a conspiracy against bards?
> > LOL!
> >
> > ~Beatdrop Battledrum
> >
> >
> > --- In eqbards@y..., James Schuldes <jgs@s...> wrote:
> > > Not true in my experience. Bard songs that buff resists do still
> > make a
> > > difference.
> > >
> > > Sylly
>
>
>
>Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter to lol@... with the subject submissions.
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/