[<a href='23953.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='23951.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='23953.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='23951.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 23952 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Thu Feb 22 21:22:28 GMT 2001 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> beatdropbattledrum@hotmail.com <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: Soft Cap on Resists (was: Patch Message) <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1340388866">So are we in agreement that this should be part of the balancing <br/>
issues for high level bards?  I think that this is an excellent point <br/>
that should be brought up.  At the same time we can confirm if the <br/>
soft cap is truth or rumor.  That is of course if the balance <br/>
discussions are still open.  <br/>
<br/>
Not it.  LOL!<br/>
<br/>
~Beatdrop Battledrum<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; there is no threat.  this is why scaling resists to 255 would make <br/>
 </span></blockquote>bards more<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; useful and desirable in high level raids.  even if all members of <br/>
 </span></blockquote>the raid can get<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; to 175 with equipment and cleric/druid/whatever buffs they would be <br/>
 </span></blockquote>hard pressed<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> &gt; to get to 255 without a bard. </span></blockquote></div>