[<a href='24005.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='24003.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='24007.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='23999.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 24004 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Mon Feb 26 21:52:51 GMT 2001 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> Kimes, Dean W. <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: [eqbards] Re: Bard% was (Patch message) <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1440796789">I am inconvenienced only in that we were theoretically limited to one song<br/>
per level and I don&#39;t get one at that level due to 7% of the people.  If<br/>
they add in another song at the level that is useful, problem solved.  My<br/>
whole point is DDD is pathetic.  Pillar of Frost can be chain cast 7 times<br/>
by a 51st level wizard for far more effect.<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
So why should you object if there is a pvp slanted song in our arsenal?  so<br/>
there&#39;s a song in there that you don&#39;t personally use.  you aren&#39;t<br/>
inconvenienced<br/>
by this song being in existence.</div>