[<a href='24071.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='24069.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='24072.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='24068.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 24070 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Tue Feb 27 17:59:30 GMT 2001 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> Kimes, Dean W. <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: [eqbards] Re: Bard% was (Patch message) <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1447356164">ditto here have never even purchased it nor ever wished I had purchased it.<br/>
<br/>
-----Original Message-----<br/>
From: Adam Wasserman [mailto:<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:wassermana@...">wassermana@...</a>]<br/>
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 11:00 AM<br/>
To: &#39;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:eqbards@yahoogroups.com">eqbards@yahoogroups.com</a>&#39;<br/>
Subject: RE: [eqbards] Re: Bard% was (Patch message)<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
i have never used concord once. never. it is useless.<br/>
<br/>
-----Original Message-----<br/>
From: Reeves, Patrick W [mailto:<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:pwr3@...">pwr3@...</a>]<br/>
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 12:48 PM<br/>
To: &#39;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:eqbards@yahoogroups.com">eqbards@yahoogroups.com</a>&#39;<br/>
Subject: RE: [eqbards] Re: Bard% was (Patch message)<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
You missed the point entirely.  The point is the song has its uses.  To say<br/>
that Clouding replaces Concord is plain stupid.  Both songs have their uses<br/>
in the right time and place.  Not every song is going to a must play song.  <br/>
<br/>
-----Original Message-----<br/>
From: Jeffrey Sue [mailto:<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:jsue@...">jsue@...</a>]<br/>
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 9:56 AM<br/>
To: <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:eqbards@yahoogroups.com">eqbards@yahoogroups.com</a><br/>
Subject: RE: [eqbards] Re: Bard% was (Patch message)<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
At 07:47 AM 2/27/01 -0800, you wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt;*sigh* Did Kenross get sold on ebay?  To say that the needed change to the<br/>
&gt;lvl 19 song (adding see invis) made the lvl 24 song pointless is about the<br/>
&gt;stupidest thing I have read on this or any list.   Next time you need to<br/>
 </span></blockquote>see<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt;invis with a pet caster around see how much they enjoy recasting their pet<br/>
&gt;when you pulse clouding to see invis.  Or maybe when you are fighting invis<br/>
&gt;mobs in PoA or another zone and have to use your flute so your party can<br/>
 </span></blockquote>see<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt;the invis mob you are fighting.<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>you mean rather than having them cast see invis on you?  is it really worth<br/>
it on<br/>
a PoA raid to have you waste a song slot and played song with lvl 24 song<br/>
rather<br/>
than getting one of probably 20 or so casters to cast see invis on you?<br/>
<br/>
Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter to <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:lol@...">lol@...</a><br/>
with the subject submissions. <br/>
<br/>
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/</a> <br/>
<br/>
<br/>
Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter to <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:lol@...">lol@...</a><br/>
with the subject submissions. <br/>
<br/>
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/</a> <br/>
<br/>
<br/>
Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter to <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:lol@...">lol@...</a><br/>
with the subject submissions. <br/>
<br/>
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/</a></div>