[<a href='24150.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='24148.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='24150.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='24148.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 24149 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Thu Mar  1 15:44:06 GMT 2001 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> Garramone, Michael (CCI-Las Vegas) <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: [eqbards] Whats the arguement? <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-192063937">because, adding a warrior, rogue, monk, or cleric is going to be more useful<br/>
than a bard helping some wizards med.  also, all our wizards will be oom and<br/>
barely have put a dent in the 500K HP of one of these mobs, and will be<br/>
using their no mana lure items like VP staff anyway.<br/>
<br/>
Shada<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> &gt; I have never fought what is now an &quot;uber mob&quot;.  However, <br/>
&gt; according to people<br/>
&gt; on this list (and others) they take in the range of 10 <br/>
&gt; minutes to kill.<br/>
&gt; Which means med times matter.  SO why wouldn&#39;t having a bard <br/>
&gt; in the wizard<br/>
&gt; group be useful? </span></blockquote></div>