[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 24164
Date: Thu Mar 1 18:55:55 GMT 2001
Author: Garramone, Michael (CCI-Las Vegas)
Subject: RE: [eqbards] Whats the arguement?


> i believe someone said the 40 minute recast was
> standing, not
> sitting. perhaps
> i misread something.

i don't know, like i said i never mem it. and the way we play, raids and
such, we do so often i don't remember the last time i had enough mana to use
it.

> my first point was that 0.20 damage per second is worst case,
> and secondly, if you thought
> DDD was useless (which it may be in most situations, although
> for those folks who
> always complain they have nothing to do in enchanter groups,
> this seems like something
> that might be worthwhile) that you must also think HT is useless.

i think Adam is right, there is always something better to do than DDD.
lemme think a sec, yes always. and if there is always something better to
do than DDD, then it is useless.

Shada