[<a href='24444.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='24442.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='0.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='24440.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 24443 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Tue Apr 10 14:27:28 BST 2001 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> Matt DeBarger <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [eqbards] Hello, new bard (level 3) and well met to all! <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-582932917">What do you mean, switching it back?  Back to the way assist was before the<br/>
last patch?  That didn&#39;t really affect this macro.  The /pet atack is needed<br/>
because some pets don&#39;t start attacking their new targets when you recharm<br/>
them.  You can tell your pet to start taunting?  I never knew that.<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> ----- Original Message -----<br/>
From: &quot;John Grady&quot; &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:john_grady@...">john_grady@...</a>&gt;<br/>
To: &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:eqbards@yahoogroups.com">eqbards@yahoogroups.com</a>&gt;<br/>
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 5:39 PM<br/>
Subject: Re: [eqbards] Hello, new bard (level 3) and well met to all!<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
&gt; One comment on your macro Matt. Since VI is changing assist back again,<br/>
&gt; the seperate /pet attack command isn&#39;t needed right? How about<br/>
&gt; substituting /pet taunt to try to reduce the damage to your party.<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; Tzeetch<br/>
&gt; </span></blockquote></div>