[<a href='24720.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='24718.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='24720.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='24718.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 24719 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Mon May 14 20:53:54 BST 2001 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> Christopher Sanders <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: [eqbards] Re: Charm Change <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1178286281">I was under the impression that this changed along with the major experience<br/>
changes a couple months back?<br/>
<br/>
Could be wrong, but I really do remember a quote as saying pets take no exp,<br/>
with no qualifications given.<br/>
<br/>
Atonal<br/>
<br/>
-----Original Message-----<br/>
From: Matt DeBarger [mailto:<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:mattdeba@...">mattdeba@...</a>]<br/>
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 3:55 PM<br/>
To: <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:eqbards@yahoogroups.com">eqbards@yahoogroups.com</a><br/>
Subject: Re: [eqbards] Re: Charm Change<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
Mage pets used to definitly take 50% of the xp if they outdamged the group.<br/>
I tested this myself way back in the day when I was a mage.  The odds of a<br/>
mage pet outdamaging the group is really slim...  I have never seen how this<br/>
applies when there are multiple pets...<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter to <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:lol@...">lol@...</a><br/>
with the subject submissions. <br/>
<br/>
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/</a></div>