[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 25162
Date: Mon Jul 9 17:27:59 BST 2001
Author: Cranfill, Wendy
Subject: RE: [eqbards] all I can say is hmmmm
> -----Original Message-----http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> From: Kimes, Dean W. [mailto:dean_kimes@...]
> Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 10:21 AM
> To: 'eqbards@yahoogroups.com'
> Subject: RE: [eqbards] all I can say is hmmmm
>
>
> Well, this is a bit different Talies. Imagine you are a live together
> couple that have parted ways, now you can actually keep your
> character when
> you split.
>
> Kitasi
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Talies the Wanderer [mailto:snicker@...]
> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 10:47 AM
> To: eqbards@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [eqbards] all I can say is hmmmm
>
>
> At 11:35 AM 7/6/2001 -0500, you wrote:
> >Seems to me that with what they are charging - it's going to
> be a "profit
> >center" for Verant. I'm concerned that Bards will be the
> type of character
> >where we'll see significant E-Bay'ers. I expect to see a
> lot of bards in
> SS
> >and POG armor with no idea how the songs work - let alone twisting.
> >
> >I don't really understand the mentality. I know I'm not
> alone in feeling
> >the early levels could be among the most fun - and learning
> the class was a
> >blast. I really enjoy getting tells from people who've
> found me randomly
> >with esoteric questions about being a bard - and stuff
> that's rarely used
> >(had one recently about the Identify Magic song).
>
>
> Anyone from DragonRealms remember the stink made when they announced
> platinum service?
>
> *grumbles*
> I didn't sub to that, and I won't sub to it here. I think it's a
> disgusting practice, to separate people based on economics.
>
> Talies the Wanderer
>
>
> Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter to
> lol@...
> with the subject submissions.
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to