At 11:57 AM 6/28/99 -0400, you wrote:

>>P.S. I haven't added 'proc' yet, because I'm unsure of it's origins...
>>Anyone wanna help here?
>
>It would indeed be interesting to know the origin of the word, but I would
>still resist its adoption when existing words are more clear, appropriate,
>and expressive.

I haven't been able to come up with a word that means the same thing - I
mean, really
proc vs. "magic weapon that casts a spell, too" is a bit prohibitive....

Talies