[<a href='25639.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='25637.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='25639.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='25637.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 25638 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Thu Dec  6 06:19:15 GMT 2001 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> Kenneth E. Bachman <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [eqbards] Another issue... <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1141060153">Talies the Wanderer wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; At 06:25 AM 12/5/2001 -0500, you wrote:<br/>
&gt; &gt;Well there has to be a date where things change.  12/03 and 12/04 was the<br/>
&gt; &gt;date.<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; No, what I meant was that he made the EXACT statement on the third that DX<br/>
&gt; 8.0 was still supported, then less than 24 hours changed his words without<br/>
&gt; explanation.<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; I feel bad for anyone who prepurchased a SOL paperweight.<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; Talies the Wanderer<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>If I&#39;m not mistaken, his new statement means that you can&#39;t run the new EQ .exe file even if you DON&#39;T buy<br/>
Luclin unless you upgrade to Win 98.  Which really sucks, since I wasn&#39;t planning to upgrade my OS for a<br/>
month or so.  It&#39;s not as if I have nothing ELSE to spend money on in DECEMBER.  Thanks for the advance<br/>
notice, Verant.  You&#39;d think that in a year of developing this product, they&#39;d have noticed that Win 95<br/>
wouldn&#39;t be sufficient sometime before YESTERDAY.  Idiots.<br/>
<br/>
This after I spent 3 days discovering that the reason I couldn&#39;t get the LAST patch to work was because<br/>
you needed to have Internet Explorer 5.5 loaded on your machine, as your default browser.  Nice of them to<br/>
forget to mention THAT, too.<br/>
<br/>
Kenross Cantorforjado, Virtuoso of Innoruuk</div>