[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 3463
Date: Tue Jul 13 22:35:08 BST 1999
Author: Keith G. Spencer
Subject: Re: Bards and Binding
>From: "Dan Harmon" <deharmon@...>gets
>
>I don't know, if I thought about it I'm sure I could come up with some
>perfectly reasonable argument that my magician should get SoW at lvl
>5...just for himself. But he never does. And it sucks. My bard never
>bind. That sucks, too. But I'd rather they never got each other'sone
>abilities.
>
>
>> From: "Kimes, Dean W." <Dean_Kimes@...>
>>
>> Hate to bring this up again, but we Bards seem more like the semi-caster
>> shamans and clerics than the Paladins and Shadowknights. I don't see why
>we
>> shouldn't have bind as a result, probably only on ourselves though. It
>> could replace the leel 14 song nicely, unless they plan on making that
>> worth buying.
>
>
>
>--------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
>
>Congratulations MilitaryEFM. Our latest ONElist of the week.
>http://www.onelist.com
>How is ONElist changing YOUR life? Visit our homepage and let us know!
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>