[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 4222
Date: Fri Jul 23 18:37:03 BST 1999
Author: Mr. Beeba
Subject: Re: Secret Code
> From: Bob Stewart <dreambard@...>
>
> At 09:30 AM 7/23/99 -0400, chlebek@... wrote:
> >Ah! You just need the secret decoder ring. Here ya go:
>
> Sorry, wrong answer. Doesn't scale. Barely works at all. Using acronyms
> that aren't widely known is inconsiderate of those with whom you are
> supposedly trying to communicate. Pointing people to an immense list of
> definitions is simply a way of saying you can't be bothered to type out
> words that would be relatively sufficient.
>
> Overuse of acronyms was one of the problems that made IBM systems difficult
> and limited their use to the priesthood. More considerate computer
> companies moved away from secret code.
>
> Acronyms are the rudest form of slang and jargon. They are even worse than
> obscure words like "proc" because they aren't even pronouncable words.
> Acronyms are effectively a way to invent new words on the fly, then use
> them and berate the reader for not knowing what they mean.
>
> I'll warn you now that I've been fighting this battle in the computer
> industry for 30 years, with some success. People either get the point and
> behave less rudely or miss the point and continue to speak in secret code,
> either not understanding or simply not caring whether they're communicating
> with the majority of their audience. If you don't mind if the majority of
> the readers simply don't know what you meant and probably won't bother to
> find out, use them, but don't kid yourself.
>
> Bob
>
> --------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
>
> ONElist users: YOU can win a $100 gift certificate to Amazon.com.
> http://www.onelist.com
> Check out the FRIENDS & FAMILY program to find out how. See homepage.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------