This seems kind of odd that the 1st level spell is better than the 24/29/34
spell. What are the differences between the two other than time and mana.
I wonder if these 24/29/34 level druid spells are the druid equivalent of
the Libretto and Teleport songs, i.e. almost worthless?

Galtin of E'ci

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jesse [SMTP:j@...]
> Sent: Friday, August 27, 1999 11:28 AM
> To: eqbards@onelist.com
> Subject: RE: [eqbards] Chain vs. snare
>
> From: Jesse <j@...>
>
>
> > Michael is right - Snare is superior in effect to chains when it works,
> i
> > don't understand why this is being argued. There are disadvantages to
> both:
> > Ensnare cost mana (big w00p, it's lvl 1 druid spell), and caster must
> stand
> > still. Chains does not last very long, but the cool thing about it is
> you
>
> Just a minor point, but make sure your druid is using Snare, NOT Ensnare.
> Snare is a level 1 spell, Ensnare is a level 24/29/34 (forget which)
> spell. Snare lasts a set time, Ensnare is inferior -- it costs more mana
> and usually runs out in 3-9 seconds.
>
>
>
> --------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
>
> ONElist: your connection to like-minds and kindred spirits.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------