[<a href='5896.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='5894.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='5896.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='5891.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 5895 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Wed Sep  1 03:46:41 BST 1999 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> jhenders@xxxxx.xxx <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: Sonorous Clouding message <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-625636329">On Tue, Aug 31/99, <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:kim@...">kim@...</a> wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; <br/>
&gt; So if the time between the message and flickering is 5<br/>
&gt; seconds, with 6 second pulses, that leaves 6 - 5 = 1 second of<br/>
&gt; vulnerability to this happening.  If the time for the message<br/>
&gt; is 6 seconds or more, our invisibility can never flicker off<br/>
&gt; because it will *always* be &quot;refreshed&quot; before it can flicker<br/>
&gt; off.<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>Unless, of course, there&#39;s a check made every time the pulse happens to<br/>
see if it succeeds. I guess we will find out as more people put this new<br/>
warning message to the test. If it suddenly makes the bard invisibility<br/>
100% reliable I&#39;m sure Verant will fix that as soon as their attention<br/>
is drawn to it. It&#39;s only when bard songs interact in a broken way with<br/>
spells that we never get fixs.<br/>
<br/>
-- <br/>
  Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity.<br/>
            GAT d- -p+(--) c++++ l++ u++ t- m--- W--- !v<br/>
                 b+++ e* s-/+ n-(?) h++ f+g+ w+++ y*</div>